The Law of “Needless Words”

Here’s another great one from Larry Parsley.  For years I have referred to this well-worn […]

Mockingbird / 9.13.16

Here’s another great one from Larry Parsley

6b05f71f918cc37785724ffc01c78d55For years I have referred to this well-worn paperback not by its title (“The Elements of Style”) but by the authors’ last names — “Strunk and White.” E.B. White (of New Yorker and children’s lit fame) was a college student at Cornell under English professor William Strunk Jr. White studied his professor’s self published volume, referred to by Strunk as “the little book.” It was, in White’s words, “a forty-three-page summation of the case for cleanliness, accuracy, and brevity in the use of English.” In 1957, White (who had published “Charlotte’s Web” five years earlier), was commissioned to revise the little book. Four editions followed, introducing new generations of writers to Strunk’s starkly stated edicts.

One of his more striking rules is #17 – “Omit needless words.” After all,

“Vigorous writing is concise. A sentence should contain no unnecessary words, a paragraph no unnecessary sentences, for the same reason that a drawing should have no unnecessary lines and a machine no unnecessary parts. This requires not that the writer make all his sentences short, or that he avoid all detail and treat his subjects only in outline, but that every word tell.”

I find it noteworthy how many times the Bible warns us to “omit needless words” — yet not for literary reasons. The world-weary author of Ecclesiastes believes that finite worshipers should let their “words be few.” The author of Proverbs bluntly declares: “Too much talk leads to sin. Be sensible and keep your mouth shut” (Proverbs 10:19 NLT). And Jesus inserts his own stylistic dictums into our prayer lives, warning us against “babbling like pagans” and assuming that excess words guarantee quick answers to our requests (Matthew 6:7). In moments of self-examination, we are left to confess all those unnecessary words we’ve babbled over a lifetime. We mourn those wasted words that inflated pride, fanned gossip, deflected blame, and annoyed Heaven. The words of Jesus, on the other hand, display a marvelous economy — with sentences like “woman, behold your son,” or “I thirst,” or “it is finished.” As we listen to Jesus from the cross, we indeed marvel at how “every word tells.”

In his introduction, White remembers his professor’s disdain for the expression, “the fact that.” Strunk wished that it could be excised from every sentence where it occurs. But even for such a gifted writer as White, omitting those three needless words proved no easy editorial feat.

“I suppose I have written the fact that a thousand times in the heat of composition, revised it out maybe five hundred times in the cool aftermath. To be batting only .500 this late in the season, to fail half the time to connect with this fat pitch, saddens me, for it seems a betrayal of the man who showed me how to swing at it and made the swinging seem worth while.”

I find White’s admission heartening. The writer, like the sinner, feels weight of the law weighing down upon those hyperactive fingers on the keyboard. And “the fact that” White was able to bat .500 shames the rest of us sad, literary benchwarmers. We plead for mercy (even as we plead verbosely).

subscribe to the Mockingbird newsletter

COMMENTS


3 responses to “The Law of “Needless Words””

  1. Ken says:

    I thought everyone called it Strunk and White! Somehow I’ve ended up with two copies of the third edition, one of which is yellowed, and which disappointed me just now when I saw that its copyright dates back only to 1979. In the Acknowledgement White thanks a woman for “her assistance in the preparation of the second edition,” and yet this same third edition comes “with revisions.” He died in ’85 – did he make revisions for the fourth edition, or is the only change Angell’s forward? I’m sure that’s a gem.

    Actually, further hunting turns up a stained but otherwise intact 95-cent first edition.

    Thanks, Larry. White was great, and leave it to Mockingbird to find a grace angle.

  2. That’s a great question, Ken. I love Angell’s Foreword, and the homage he pays to his stepfather. That’s not a bad genealogy there — Strunk to White to Angell!

  3. Dave Strunk says:

    I’m glad you guys finally covered an author with real style and flair. I hope you see my irony.

    -Dave Strunk

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *